Pipe sealing compounds manufacturing · Ohio

Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing

Cleveland, OH · ~310 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pipe sealing compounds manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing: 2.4 TCR = 73% of Pipe sealing compounds manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing safety composite

Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing: 2.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2024

Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing's TCR rose 1.0 from 2.0 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325520 · Cleveland, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 73% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #16/38
  • PHOTO American Sealants In…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~310 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Sealants Inc- Nevada Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing averages 2.4 TCR (73% of the Pipe sealing compounds manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing falls in its industry

287 Pipe sealing compounds manufac establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 38 Pipe sealing compounds manufac employers in Ohio.

Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing (310 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing
Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing (310 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Oatey Co - Cleveland Manufacturing has more employees than the Pipe sealing compounds manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.1 7 0 0
2023 2.2 1.3 5 0 0
2022 3.2 1.1 9 0 0
2021 1.3 0.0 4 0 0
2020 3.4 1.7 10 0 0
2019 3.4 3.1 9 0 0
2018 1.4 0.7 4 0 0
2017 1.8 1.1 5 0 0
2016 2.0 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325520 · OH · Cleveland

287 Pipe sealing compounds manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Sealants Inc- Nevada Plant 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ardex, L.P. Bourbonnais 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAPEI Garland, TX 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henkel 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trans Ash - Main 310 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marzetti Indianola 310 FTE
STATE-SIZE Defiance Metal Products 310 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orwell 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR Rossi Building - Front - Construction Inspectors 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR GIW Industries, Inc. - Grovetown, Ga 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Acme Alliance, LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fogelsville EPS Plant 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 34 310 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russellville Pouring Plant 310 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abbyland Pork Pack 310 FTE
NAT-SIZE King and Prince Seafood Brunswick 310 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.