Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) · Washington

Office of Field Operations - Seattle

Seattle, WA · ~1,935 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Office of Field Operations - Seattle runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) workplace, earning a grade D.

Office of Field Operations - Seattle: 5.6 TCR = 175% of Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Office of Field Operations - Seattle safety composite

Office of Field Operations - Seattle scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 5.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2018

Office of Field Operations - Seattle injury rate improved

Office of Field Operations - Seattle's TCR fell 1.0 from 6.1 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.1 · 2018=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922120 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 175% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO CITY OF FREMONT-POLI…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 207 inj
  • SIZE ~1,935 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CITY OF FREMONT-POLICE DEPARTMENT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Office of Field Operations - Seattle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Office of Field Operations - Seattle averages 5.6 TCR (175% of the Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Office of Field Operations - Seattle TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2018=5.1 · BLS 3.2

Where Office of Field Operations - Seattle falls in its industry

716 Police departments (except Ame establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Police departments (except Ame employers in Washington.

Office of Field Operations - Seattle (1,935 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Office of Field Operations - Seattle
Office of Field Operations - Seattle (1,935 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5

Office of Field Operations - Seattle has more employees than the Police departments (except American Indi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.1 2.8 108 2 0
2016 6.1 2.5 99 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922120 · WA · Seattle

716 Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CITY OF FREMONT-POLICE DEPARTMENT 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pennington County Law Enforcement Center 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Carolina Department of Public Safety - State Transport Police 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Windsor Police Department 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Washington State Ferries 1,939 FTE
STATE-SIZE 600 1,922 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clark County Washington 1,906 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6994-PL600 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Hatteras Avon Office 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia (Mocol) 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mills Pond Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #559 (Orefino, ID) 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Janssen Horsham 1,935 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCI Communication Corp. 1,935 FTE
NAT-SIZE AAON, Inc. 1,935 FTE
NAT-SIZE AWNC 1,936 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.