Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · California

Ohno Construction Company CA

Jurupa Valley, CA · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ohno Construction Company CA runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Ohno Construction Company CA: 2.8 TCR = 101% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ohno Construction Company CA safety composite

Ohno Construction Company CA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2021→2022

Ohno Construction Company CA injury rate improved

Ohno Construction Company CA's TCR fell 0.8 from 3.2 in 2021 to 2.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.2 · 2022=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Jurupa Valley, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 101% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #97/201
  • PHOTO Spiniello Companies …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spiniello Companies - Pomona (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ohno Construction Company CA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ohno Construction Company CA averages 2.8 TCR (101% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ohno Construction Company CA TCR series: 2021=3.2 · 2022=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Ohno Construction Company CA falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #97 safest of 201 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in California.

Ohno Construction Company CA (38 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ohno Construction Company CA
Ohno Construction Company CA (38 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Ohno Construction Company CA has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 3.2 3.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · Jurupa Valley

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 49 employers in Jurupa Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spiniello Companies - Pomona 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reyes Group Ltd Texas 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chandler Construction Services, Inc. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jurupa Valley Terminal 1,045 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ONT1 776 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jurupa Valley, CA (Walmart) 432 476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUR7 303 FTE
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-ERI-ERIE-ERI-PDMT 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fayette County Services 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Heubel Material Handling/Oklahoma City OK 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Salut Bar Americain, Grand Ave 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE BDZE Developers, Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG749 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0645 Vantage Foods Inc. - Camp Hill 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0089 Tyson Foods Inc. - Russellville 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.