Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Virginia

Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building

Leesburg, VA · ~49 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building: 2.8 TCR = 101% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building safety composite

Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2020→2024

Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building injury rate improved

Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building's TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.8 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Leesburg, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/48
  • PHOTO Chandler Constructio…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chandler Construction Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building averages 2.8 TCR (101% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building TCR series: 2020=4.8 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 48 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Virginia.

Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building (49 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building
Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building (49 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Utilities Admin/Maintenance Building has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 0 1 0
2020 4.8 4.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · VA · Leesburg

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 91 employers in Leesburg, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chandler Construction Services, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cossentino Contracting Co., Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohno Construction Company CA 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spiniello Companies - Pomona 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aarons Creek Farms Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Services : OM - Birchwood Power Partners, VA, USA 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE WDC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE SERVICEMASTER OF SHENANDOAH VALLEY, INC. 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inova Loudoun Hospital 1,539 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker K2M 784 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Leesburg 575 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Leesburg 044 427 FTE
NAT-TCR Ruppert - Truckee 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Yoder Smokers Inc 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Plantation Village 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Roofscreen Mfg., Inc 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Adaptive Micro Systems, LLC 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Earle M Jorgensen Co 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Athens - Graham 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE C.F. Maier Composites, Inc. 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.