General medical and surgical hospitals · Minnesota

Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills

Rochester, MN · ~29 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade A.

Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills: 1.3 TCR = 17% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills safety composite

Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2017→2022

Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills injury rate improved

Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills's TCR fell 4.1 from 4.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.1 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Rochester, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/249
  • PHOTO MERCY HOSPITAL KINGF…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MERCY HOSPITAL KINGFISHER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills averages 1.3 TCR (17% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 7.5

Where Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 249 General medical and surgical h employers in Minnesota.

Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills (29 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills
Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills (29 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Olmsted Medical Center Elton Hills has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2017 4.1 4.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MN · Rochester

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MERCY HOSPITAL KINGFISHER 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston Methodist CORPORATE DIVISION 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR A048 - Biomedical Research Building 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Divine Providence Hospital 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR 104012 - NGL-Fields Point LNG Facility 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HG753 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MedVet Northern Utah 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR US - Branch Network : 0146 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3495-11DA531 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Two Men and a Truck/Augusta 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Appleway Custom Stairs & Railing 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baldwin Pole & Piling, Inc. 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.