Water control and quality program administration · California

O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1)

Sacramento, CA · ~238 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1) runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Water control and quality program administration workplace, earning a grade A.

O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1): 0.3 TCR = 8% of Water control and quality program administration BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1) safety composite

O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2019→2020

O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1) injury rate improved

O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1)'s TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.5 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/56
  • PHOTO Division of Safety O…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~238 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Division of Safety Of Dams (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1) averages 0.3 TCR (8% of the Water control and quality program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1) TCR series: 2019=0.5 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.2

Where O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1) falls in its industry

131 Water control and quality prog establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 56 Water control and quality prog employers in California.

O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1) (238 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1)
O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1) (238 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1) has more employees than the Water control and quality program admini median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.5 0.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · CA · Sacramento

131 Water control and quality program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Division of Safety Of Dams 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Office 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Environmental Conservation (1) 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sims/Aycock 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Panoche Creek Packing 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guerrero Labor Contractor 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enphase Energy Fremont, CA 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Division #9 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR APL Logistics 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Gehan Homes, LTD. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Alert Innovation 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Colorado Structures Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meijer Store 104 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer Store 269 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honorable George N. Leighton Criminal Courthouse 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer #270 238 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.