Water control and quality program administration · California

O&M - San Luis Field Division

Gustine, CA · ~135 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

O&M - San Luis Field Division runs at 229% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water control and quality program administration workplace, earning a grade F.

O&M - San Luis Field Division: 7.3 TCR = 229% of Water control and quality program administration BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

O&M - San Luis Field Division safety composite

O&M - San Luis Field Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2017→2024

O&M - San Luis Field Division injury rate improved

O&M - San Luis Field Division's TCR fell 5.1 from 9.0 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.0 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=9.0 · 2023=8.2 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · Gustine, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 229% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #48/56
  • PHOTO O&M - San Joaquin Fi…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: O&M - San Joaquin Field Division (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

O&M - San Luis Field Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows O&M - San Luis Field Division averages 7.3 TCR (229% of the Water control and quality program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

O&M - San Luis Field Division TCR series: 2017=9 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=9 · 2023=8.2 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.2

Where O&M - San Luis Field Division falls in its industry

131 Water control and quality prog establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 56 Water control and quality prog employers in California.

O&M - San Luis Field Division (135 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate O&M - San Luis Field Division
O&M - San Luis Field Division (135 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

O&M - San Luis Field Division has more employees than the Water control and quality program admini median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 1.6 4 1 0
2023 8.2 1.6 2 8 0
2022 9.0 2.7 4 6 0
2021 10.2 3.7 0 11 0
2020 5.5 1.8 2 4 0
2019 3.8 3.8 4 0 0
2018 8.8 3.5 6 4 0
2017 9.0 3.3 9 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · CA · Gustine

131 Water control and quality program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 6 employers in Gustine, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR O&M - San Joaquin Field Division 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanitary District of Decatur 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ventura Water 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orange County - Solid Waste Management 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vino Vid Inc 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saticoy Lemon Association - Oxnard 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Shippers LP | Bakersfield Packinghouse 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Pak Avocado 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saputo Cheese USA Inc. Gustine 349 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gustine 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gustine John B. Sanfilippo & Son 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR JF4 Enterprises, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-TCR Amarillo Foreward Warehouse 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Waterbury 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Academy 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Temple 181 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbus West School 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scotch Plywood Company Beatrice Division 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powerhouse Recycling 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE preferred care at old bridge 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.