Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · California

On Lok Inc

San Francisco, CA · ~664 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

On Lok Inc runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade D.

On Lok Inc: 5.7 TCR = 149% of Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

On Lok Inc safety composite

On Lok Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2018→2024

On Lok Inc injury rate improved

On Lok Inc's TCR fell 3.8 from 7.6 in 2018 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.6 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 149% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #148/230
  • PHOTO Community Options Ro…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~664 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Community Options Rockville MD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

On Lok Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows On Lok Inc averages 5.7 TCR (149% of the Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

On Lok Inc TCR series: 2018=7.6 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 3.8

Where On Lok Inc falls in its industry

1,320 Day care centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #148 safest of 230 Day care centers for disabled employers in California.

On Lok Inc (664 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate On Lok Inc
On Lok Inc (664 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

On Lok Inc has more employees than the Day care centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 2.5 3 0 0
2018 7.6 1.5 6 80 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · San Francisco

1,320 Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Community Options Rockville MD 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Napa Valley Support Services 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kaiser Home Support Services, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brewster Street 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE All American Asphalt 664 FTE
STATE-SIZE SCRMCA73 664 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prima Wawona - West Ranches 665 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Nevell Group 663 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Hca Florida Bayonet Point Hospital 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 001 Nacogdoches 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR JOVE Laboratories, LLC. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Plymouth Spring Company 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hardware Resources 664 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mettler Toledo Product Inspection 664 FTE
NAT-SIZE PVH Corp. 664 FTE
NAT-SIZE FedEx Supply Chain Cummins MDC1 664 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.