Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing · South Carolina

Ortec - Pendleton

Pendleton, SC · ~25 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ortec - Pendleton runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Ortec - Pendleton: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ortec - Pendleton safety composite

Ortec - Pendleton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ortec - Pendleton held a steady TCR band

Ortec - Pendleton's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325199 · Pendleton, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/21
  • PHOTO Dupont Michigan Oper…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dupont Michigan Operations - HIMS Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Ortec - Pendleton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ortec - Pendleton averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ortec - Pendleton TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Ortec - Pendleton falls in its industry

552 Carbon organic compounds, not establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 21 Carbon organic compounds, not employers in South Carolina.

Ortec - Pendleton (25 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Ortec - Pendleton
Ortec - Pendleton (25 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Ortec - Pendleton has fewer employees than the Carbon organic compounds, not specified median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325199 · SC · Pendleton

552 Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 13 employers in Pendleton, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dupont Michigan Operations - HIMS Plant 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perstorp 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DuPont Cooper River 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cayman Chemical Inc 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Field Services Tech Building (Columbia) 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clemson Operations Center 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Mill Operations Center 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Repairs 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arthrex Manufacturing South Carolina 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milliken & Co - Pendleton Finishing Plant 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milliken Pendleton Plant 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant 165 FTE
NAT-TCR Insituform Techologies LLC - Jacksonville 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR International Isotopes Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Starr Electric Company, Inc Charlotte 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Casino Creek Concrete, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE C&B Piping (East), Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pyrotek - Spokane 14D 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4114-Moxy Louisville Dt 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.