Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · New York
Oswego Harbor Power
Oswego, NY · ~43 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 0.9
- Avg TCR
- 1.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Oswego Harbor Power runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade B.
Oswego Harbor Power: 0.9 TCR = 78% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Oswego Harbor Power safety composite
Oswego Harbor Power scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
65/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- C 0.93 per 100 workers
Safer than 69% of industry peers
- DART rate
- C 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 71% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−1.9
2016→2024
Oswego Harbor Power injury rate improved
Oswego Harbor Power's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=1.9 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 221112 · Oswego, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL
Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 78% of ind
- DART 0.0 DART
- RANK #7/29
- PHOTO Karn-Weadock Admin B…
- BOOK 9y book
- INJ 4 inj
- SIZE ~43 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Karn-Weadock Admin Building (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →
Oswego Harbor Power in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Oswego Harbor Power
0.9 TCR
- Karn-Weadock A
Karn-Weadock Admin Building
0.9 TCR
- Plant McIntosh
Plant McIntosh
0.9 TCR
- JH Campbell 3
JH Campbell 3
0.9 TCR
- Panda Patriot,
Panda Patriot, LLC
0.9 TCR
What this shows Oswego Harbor Power averages 0.9 TCR (78% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).
Oswego Harbor Power TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2
Where Oswego Harbor Power falls in its industry
846 Electric power generation, fos establishmentsSafer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.
Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 29 Electric power generation, fos employers in New York.
Oswego Harbor Power has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
221112 · NY · Oswego
846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 46 employers in Oswego, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Karn-Weadock Admin Building | 0.9 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Plant McIntosh | 0.9 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | JH Campbell 3 | 0.9 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Panda Patriot, LLC | 0.9 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Phillips Family Farm, Inc. | 43 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Aurora Ridge Dairy, LLC | 43 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Allenwaite Farms, Inc. | 43 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | NYSEG 3 City Center | 43 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Novelis Oswego Works | 1,162 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Novelis Corporation | 1,136 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Oswego Hospital | 1,114 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant | 586 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Data Security, Inc. | 0.9 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Hamilton 10494 | 0.9 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Potters Industries LLC | 0.9 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Lpr Construction | 0.9 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Arlington Heights, Il | 43 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg | 43 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Sircal Contracting, Inc. | 43 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | James Candy Company, LLC | 43 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.