Tofu (i.e., bean curd) (except frozen desserts) manufacturing · Oregon

Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc.

Tualatin, OR · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc. runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tofu (i.e., bean curd) (except frozen desserts) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc.: 7.2 TCR = 176% of Tofu (i.e., bean curd) (except frozen desserts) manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc. safety composite

Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2016→2024

Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc. injury rate improved

Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.4 from 12.6 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 16.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.6 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=16.5 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Tualatin, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 176% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/12
  • PHOTO West Soy Tofu
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Soy Tofu (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc. averages 7.2 TCR (176% of the Tofu (i.e., bean curd) (except frozen desserts) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc. TCR series: 2016=12.6 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=16.5 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 4.1

Where Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc. falls in its industry

376 Tofu (i.e., bean curd) (except establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 12 Tofu (i.e., bean curd) (except employers in Oregon.

Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc. (37 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc.
Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc. (37 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Pacific Nutritional Foods, Inc. has fewer employees than the Tofu (i.e., bean curd) (except frozen de median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 0.0 0 2 0
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2022 16.5 9.9 4 1 0
2021 5.3 0.0 1 1 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2018 9.7 7.3 4 0 0
2017 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2016 12.6 12.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · OR · Tualatin

376 Tofu (i.e., bean curd) (except frozen desserts) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 154 employers in Tualatin, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Soy Tofu 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mart Fresh Pack LLC 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RESER'S-TOPEKA SALAD PLANT 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosina Food Products - Empire 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE BIZON NURSERY LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE SNOW PEAK AREA 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Eugene RC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Parkrose RC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus 2,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300 1,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-PL300 1,111 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-MP 1,111 FTE
NAT-TCR VTC Enterprises VSFB Commissary 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Roe Painting, Inc 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HEW4 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Focus Concrete, LLC 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE TRH006 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenmart of Nevada NLV, LLC 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE BDRFL-Edgewater 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake County 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.