Dimension stock, wood, manufacturing · Oregon

Pacific Pine Products, Inc.

Lakeview, OR · ~77 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Pine Products, Inc. runs at 296% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Dimension stock, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Pacific Pine Products, Inc.: 9.8 TCR = 296% of Dimension stock, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Pine Products, Inc. safety composite

Pacific Pine Products, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2023

Pacific Pine Products, Inc. injury rate improved

Pacific Pine Products, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.5 from 8.2 in 2016 to 7.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 81.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.2 · 2017=16.7 · 2018=17.6 · 2019=81.1 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=7.0 · 2023=7.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321912 · Lakeview, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 296% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #15/24
  • PHOTO JFM International
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JFM International (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Pine Products, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Pine Products, Inc. averages 9.8 TCR (296% of the Dimension stock, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Pine Products, Inc. TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2017=16.7 · 2018=17.6 · 2019=81.1 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=7 · 2023=7.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Pacific Pine Products, Inc. falls in its industry

178 Dimension stock, wood, manufac establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 24 Dimension stock, wood, manufac employers in Oregon.

Pacific Pine Products, Inc. (77 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Pine Products, Inc.
Pacific Pine Products, Inc. (77 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Pacific Pine Products, Inc. has more employees than the Dimension stock, wood, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.7 2.6 6 0 0
2022 7.0 5.6 5 0 0
2021 6.5 2.6 5 0 0
2020 4.6 0.0 3 0 0
2019 81.1 71.0 8 0 0
2018 17.6 9.4 13 0 0
2017 16.7 10.6 11 0 0
2016 8.2 6.2 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321912 · OR · Lakeview

178 Dimension stock, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 6 employers in Lakeview, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JFM International 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Catawissa Wood and Components, Inc 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Siskiyou Forest Products 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lewis & Hockenberry, Inc. 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oregon Roses, Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Halsey 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Junction City 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE O'Brien and Company LLC 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeview Sawmill 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-04316 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0019-0019-04316 FAC-04316-LAKEVIEW-OR 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY 0019 4316 43 FTE
NAT-TCR 0652 - Minneapolis Mn Bus Ctr 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mark Greenspan 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Masonry Construction 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR AMPAM Parks Mechanical 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 10406 Laguna Beach (WO) 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oilfield Instrumentation 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cook Compression 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Supply, Inc 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.