Scaffold erecting and dismantling · New Jersey

Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS

Linden, NJ · ~118 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Scaffold erecting and dismantling workplace, earning a grade A.

Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS: 0.5 TCR = 17% of Scaffold erecting and dismantling BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS safety composite

Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS: 0.0 → 0.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS's TCR rose 0.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Linden, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/36
  • PHOTO Core Communications
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Core Communications (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Scaffold erecting and dismantling BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS falls in its industry

1,634 Scaffold erecting and dismantl establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 36 Scaffold erecting and dismantl employers in New Jersey.

Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS (118 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS
Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS (118 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS has more employees than the Scaffold erecting and dismantling median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2018 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · NJ · Linden

1,634 Scaffold erecting and dismantling employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 108 employers in Linden, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Core Communications 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brand Scaffold Services Inc. - Torrance Refinery 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apache - Ineos Styrolution 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE EGM Builders 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJRHS - Wall 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4over International LLC - NJ State 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amneal- 65 RR 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Apron Linden FC 879 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phillips66 Bayway Refinery 771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Staffing Solutions 766 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bayway Refinery 693 FTE
NAT-TCR GSI America, INC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at St Ambrose-University Center 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Business 1 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CSI Fabrication Shop 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Industrial Performance Group of NC, Inc. 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Clair Shores Parks/Recreation/Senior Center 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Regent Bellevue 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHS - Interlude Fridley 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.