General Warehousing and Storage · Pennsylvania

Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg

Harrisburg, PA · ~184 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade B.

Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg: 4.6 TCR = 80% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg safety composite

Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2019→2023

Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg injury rate improved

Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg's TCR fell 0.7 from 3.8 in 2019 to 3.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.8 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Harrisburg, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #375/650
  • PHOTO NEPW Logistics - Sca…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~184 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NEPW Logistics - Scarborough (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg averages 4.6 TCR (80% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg TCR series: 2019=3.8 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=4 · 2022=3 · 2023=3.1 · BLS 5.8

Where Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #375 safest of 650 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Pennsylvania.

Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg (184 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg
Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg (184 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Pahai - Ups E-Logistics/Harrisburg has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.1 0.8 4 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 4 0 0
2021 4.0 1.3 6 0 0
2020 9.4 8.8 14 1 0
2019 3.8 1.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · PA · Harrisburg

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 362 employers in Harrisburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NEPW Logistics - Scarborough 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5832 SEATTLE MDC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-200 NESTLE WAY 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prime Now LLC - USD1 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Massaro Construction Group 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Forge PA 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harmony Biosciences, LLC 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Electrical Material Company 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle Hospitals 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHS/HARRISBURG HOSPITAL 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pinnacle Health Medical Services 2,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle 2,311 FTE
NAT-TCR Caoai - Kawasaki Power Sports Dlo - 10681 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Steel Technologies Eminence 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Flextronics Automotive Manufacturing Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GA Foods_Birmingham 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newport Marriott 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE Union Tank Car Company - Marion, OH 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakwood Springs Hospital 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steele Solutions Inc - Milwaukee 184 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.