Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · Minnesota

Palleton of Minnesota, Inc.

Austin, MN · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Palleton of Minnesota, Inc. runs at 407% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Palleton of Minnesota, Inc.: 13.4 TCR = 407% of Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Palleton of Minnesota, Inc. safety composite

Palleton of Minnesota, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.0

2017→2024

Palleton of Minnesota, Inc. injury rate improved

Palleton of Minnesota, Inc.'s TCR fell 10.0 from 25.1 in 2017 to 15.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 25.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=25.1 · 2018=13.5 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=15.2 · 2023=15.1 · 2024=15.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Austin, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.4 · 407% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/18
  • PHOTO DONALD B REMMEY INC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DONALD B REMMEY INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Palleton of Minnesota, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Palleton of Minnesota, Inc. averages 13.4 TCR (407% of the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Palleton of Minnesota, Inc. TCR series: 2017=25.1 · 2018=13.5 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=15.2 · 2023=15.1 · 2024=15.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Palleton of Minnesota, Inc. falls in its industry

952 Pallets, wood or wood and meta establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 18 Pallets, wood or wood and meta employers in Minnesota.

Palleton of Minnesota, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Palleton of Minnesota, Inc.
Palleton of Minnesota, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Palleton of Minnesota, Inc. has fewer employees than the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combinat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.1 0.0 4 0 0
2023 15.1 11.3 4 0 0
2022 15.2 7.6 4 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2020 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2019 11.3 7.5 3 0 0
2018 13.5 6.8 4 0 0
2017 25.1 22.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · MN · Austin

952 Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 75 employers in Austin, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DONALD B REMMEY INC 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millwood Inc. - Rochester 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millwood Inc. - Apple Creek 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millwood, Inc. Waco TX 13.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hormel Foods - Austin 1,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hormel Foods - Austin Plant 1,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hormel Foods Corporation 1,581 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quality Pork Processors Inc. 1,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Angelus Block - Fontana 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1161 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1104 - NSM Concordia 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eclectic Russell Do It Center 13.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Santa Clara Methodist Retirement Foundation, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sacramento 2 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Firestone 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Torq Corporation 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.