Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors · California

Sacramento 2

Sacramento, CA · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sacramento 2 runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Sacramento 2: 1.9 TCR = 69% of Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sacramento 2 safety composite

Sacramento 2 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2017→2024

Sacramento 2 injury rate improved

Sacramento 2's TCR fell 5.9 from 5.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #185/548
  • PHOTO Gilmore Electric, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gilmore Electric, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sacramento 2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sacramento 2 averages 1.9 TCR (69% of the Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sacramento 2 TCR series: 2017=5.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Sacramento 2 falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications equipment a establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #185 safest of 548 Telecommunications equipment a employers in California.

Sacramento 2 (29 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sacramento 2
Sacramento 2 (29 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Sacramento 2 has fewer employees than the Telecommunications equipment and wiring median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2017 5.9 3.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · Sacramento

4,550 Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gilmore Electric, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artistic Lighting & Electric 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hil-Man Automation LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Austin 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sean V. Doherty Farms 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanco Farms, LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SHOP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cottonwood Farms 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Celadon Systems 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Waseca 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Machines, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Firestone 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE EI088 - Lake City Office 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Torq Corporation 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.