Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) · Texas

PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling

Luling, TX · ~200 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) workplace, earning a grade A.

PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling: 1.2 TCR = 31% of Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling safety composite

PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−918.5

2016→2018

PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling injury rate improved

PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling's TCR fell 918.5 from 920.0 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 920.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=920.0 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Luling, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/221
  • PHOTO The Rehabilitation I…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Rehabilitation Institute of St Louis - St Peters (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling averages 1.2 TCR (31% of the Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling TCR series: 2016=920 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=1.5 · BLS 3.8

Where PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling falls in its industry

1,390 Hospitals, specialty (except p establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 221 Hospitals, specialty (except p employers in Texas.

PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling (200 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling
PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling (200 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

PAM Specialty Hospital of Luling has more employees than the Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 920.0 184.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · TX · Luling

1,390 Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 13 employers in Luling, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Rehabilitation Institute of St Louis - St Peters 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR H7220 SOLARA HOSPITAL - HARLINGEN 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arkansas Continued Care Hospital 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kennedy Krieger Greenspring-Center for Autism POB 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1400 W LOOP 340, WACO CALL CTR (SS) 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE SI Environmental 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE KIK Underground, LLC 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE WeldFit Services 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR PAM Specialty of Luling 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-TXAUS31 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXAUS31 ASCENSION SETON EDGAR B DAVIS HOSP 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magnolia Living & Rehabilitation 87 FTE
NAT-TCR KTL 53028 Newton 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kimball Electronics Jasper 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Plastic Trends 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Nri, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Manor Care Health Services - Wilmington 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rennes Health & Rehab Center-East 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE MaineGeneral Medical Center - Ballard Center 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Season 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.