CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services · California

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest

Lake Forest, CA · ~166 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services workplace, earning a grade B.

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest: 0.3 TCR = 58% of CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest safety composite

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2022→2023

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest injury rate improved

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.6 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Lake Forest, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.3 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/19
  • PHOTO US OK Oklahoma City 01
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: US OK Oklahoma City 01 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest averages 0.3 TCR (58% of the CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest TCR series: 2022=0.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest falls in its industry

181 CAD (computer-aided design) sy establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 19 CAD (computer-aided design) sy employers in California.

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest (166 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest
Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest (166 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Panasonic Avionics Corporation Lake Forest has fewer employees than the CAD (computer-aided design) systems inte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · CA · Lake Forest

181 CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 90 employers in Lake Forest, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR US OK Oklahoma City 01 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR USAVA01 - Virgina - Fredericksburg 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEH- 1 Riverfront 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Jose Almaden 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kay Dix, Inc. 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLOVIS OFFICE 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stronghold Engineering, Inc. 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concrete North, Inc. 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Panasonic Avionics Corporation 2,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARB, Inc. 1,334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest 598 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASSA ABLOY Americas Residential, Inc., Lake Forest 594 FTE
NAT-TCR GA - Google Skyview 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Swansea RHCC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rohr Aero Services LLC (Foley AL) 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Renco Electronics, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Unarco Material Handling, Inc 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunrise Enterprises 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mayo Clinic Health System-Oakridge (Osseo) 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DSX7 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.