Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing · South Carolina

Parker Spartanburg SC

Name: Parker Spartanburg SC Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Spartanburg, SC · ~112 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parker Spartanburg SC runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Parker Spartanburg SC: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parker Spartanburg SC safety composite

Parker Spartanburg SC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Parker Spartanburg SC held a steady TCR band

Parker Spartanburg SC's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.6 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.6 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Spartanburg, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #4/5
PHOTO EGC
BOOK 2y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EGC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.5
EGC

1.5
Chesterton - G

1.5
Truvant

1.5
Engineered Mat

1.5

What this shows Parker Spartanburg SC averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Parker Spartanburg SC TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Parker Spartanburg SC falls in its industry

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing d establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Gasket, packing, and sealing d employers in South Carolina.

Parker Spartanburg SC (112 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Parker Spartanburg SC has more employees than the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	1.4	0.0	2	0	0
2016	1.6	0.8	2	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · SC · Spartanburg

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 294 employers in Spartanburg, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	EGC	CHARDON, OH	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Chesterton - Groveland	GROVELAND, MA	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Truvant	HASLET, TX	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Engineered Materials : Lebanon	LEBANON, TN	1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Bethune	BETHUNE	112 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CFE Management, LLC	ORANGEBURG	112 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Sage Automotive Interiors Sharon Plant	ABBEVILLE	112 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Cox Industries-Corporate	ORANGEBURG	112 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SPARTANBURG FOOD	Spartanburg	8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Spartanburg Medical Center	Spartanburg	5,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Spartanburg County	Spartanburg	1,633 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Spartanburg County Government	Spartanburg	1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR	Capital Building Service Group	Westmont, IL	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Titan Global, LLC	Islandia, NY	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Simonton Windows: Ellenboro, WV	Ellenboro, WV	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	4028-AZ000	Phoenix, AZ	1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Peapod S&S Watertown, Ma	Watertown, MA	112 FTE
NAT-SIZE	River View on the Appomattox Health & Rehab Center	Hopewell, VA	112 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Duvall Road	Chatsworth, GA	112 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Tupelo (Mstup)	Tupelo, MS	112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.