Parks and recreation commission, government · North Carolina

Parks, Recreation & Maintenance

Fayetteville, NC · ~328 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parks, Recreation & Maintenance runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Parks and recreation commission, government workplace, earning a grade D.

Parks, Recreation & Maintenance: 5.3 TCR = 166% of Parks and recreation commission, government BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parks, Recreation & Maintenance safety composite

Parks, Recreation & Maintenance scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Parks, Recreation & Maintenance held a steady TCR band

Parks, Recreation & Maintenance's TCR held near 0.3 from 5.5 in 2023 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=5.5 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Fayetteville, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 166% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #9/16
  • PHOTO Channahon Park Distr…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~328 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Channahon Park District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Parks, Recreation & Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parks, Recreation & Maintenance averages 5.3 TCR (166% of the Parks and recreation commission, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parks, Recreation & Maintenance TCR series: 2023=5.5 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.2

Where Parks, Recreation & Maintenance falls in its industry

413 Parks and recreation commissio establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 16 Parks and recreation commissio employers in North Carolina.

Parks, Recreation & Maintenance (328 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Parks, Recreation & Maintenance
Parks, Recreation & Maintenance (328 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Parks, Recreation & Maintenance has more employees than the Parks and recreation commission, governm median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 4.1 10 0 1
2023 5.5 3.3 7 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · NC · Fayetteville

413 Parks and recreation commission, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Channahon Park District 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EI002 - Bemidji Headquarters 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stevens Erosion Control 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Of Sacramento-Recreation Services Roll-Up (190015) 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greensboro Blend Plant 328 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardagh Metal Packaging - Winston-Salem 328 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1355 328 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1010 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County 5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Cumberland 2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Fayetteville 2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR Tierra Pines Center 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Calpipe Industries, LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR General Extrusions International LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mdcum - Cumberland 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Clay 328 FTE
NAT-SIZE MHHS-Texas Medical Ctr 328 FTE
NAT-SIZE Offerpad LLC. 328 FTE
NAT-SIZE Center for Employment Opportunities Inc. 328 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.