Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Texas

Pasadena Power Plant

Pasadena, TX · ~26 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pasadena Power Plant runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade A.

Pasadena Power Plant: 0.4 TCR = 34% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pasadena Power Plant safety composite

Pasadena Power Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pasadena Power Plant held a steady TCR band

Pasadena Power Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Pasadena, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/86
  • PHOTO URQUHART STEAM PLANT
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: URQUHART STEAM PLANT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Pasadena Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pasadena Power Plant averages 0.4 TCR (34% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pasadena Power Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Pasadena Power Plant falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 86 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Texas.

Pasadena Power Plant (26 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pasadena Power Plant
Pasadena Power Plant (26 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Pasadena Power Plant has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Pasadena

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 385 employers in Pasadena, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR URQUHART STEAM PLANT 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSE, ESO - Eastside System Operations 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Doswell Energy Center 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allen Steam Station 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Belding Farms 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friona Industries, L.P. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keeling Cattle Feeders 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Descanso Dairy, LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSC Group 4,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroleum Service Corporation 3,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR JVIC 3,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brand Energy Solutions, LLC - Houston 2,015 FTE
NAT-TCR Admin/Sales - ARCo 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt & Whitney East Hartford 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Versant Power Telcom Ops Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR City Hall 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vcf 113 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermal Design Madison Net Zero 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hulett Environmental Services, Inc. - Fort Pierce Office 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 08 Saginaw 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.