ALL printing operations including digital printing · North Carolina

PBM Graphics - RTP

Durham, NC · ~579 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PBM Graphics - RTP runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical ALL printing operations including digital printing workplace, earning a grade B.

PBM Graphics - RTP: 2.5 TCR = 76% of ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PBM Graphics - RTP safety composite

PBM Graphics - RTP scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2024

PBM Graphics - RTP injury rate improved

PBM Graphics - RTP's TCR fell 2.2 from 4.2 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=2.4 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Durham, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 76% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #51/92
  • PHOTO CCL Label
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 127 inj
  • SIZE ~579 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CCL Label (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

PBM Graphics - RTP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PBM Graphics - RTP averages 2.5 TCR (76% of the ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PBM Graphics - RTP TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.4 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where PBM Graphics - RTP falls in its industry

2,001 ALL printing operations includ establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 92 ALL printing operations includ employers in North Carolina.

PBM Graphics - RTP (579 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate PBM Graphics - RTP
PBM Graphics - RTP (579 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

PBM Graphics - RTP has more employees than the ALL printing operations including digita median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 0.7 9 0 0
2022 2.4 0.1 16 0 0
2021 3.0 1.2 18 0 0
2020 1.9 1.7 9 0 0
2019 1.5 1.5 7 0 0
2018 1.7 1.3 8 1 0
2017 3.3 2.5 28 0 0
2016 4.2 2.7 32 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NC · Durham

2,001 ALL printing operations including digital printing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CCL Label 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GENTI STUDIOS INC DBA CULMINATE 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wild Blue - De Pere, Wisconsin 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Redstone Impressions, Inc 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alside Window Company - Southeast 579 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Foods Raleigh Division 579 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bioventus, LLC Durham 580 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raleigh 578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR QUAKERTOWN 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Culpepper Construction Company, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR O&R Blooming Grove 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR B.J. Baldwin Electric Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE BAE Systems Electronic Systems ATX 579 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howmet Aerospace Whitehall Operations - Whitehall Casting Plant 10 579 FTE
NAT-SIZE MA - Burlington 579 FTE
NAT-SIZE Environmental Science Associates 579 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.