Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Pennsylvania

Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division

Scottdale, PA · ~62 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division safety composite

Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division held a steady TCR band

Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Scottdale, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/54
  • PHOTO 15-100 IN
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 15-100 IN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 54 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Pennsylvania.

Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division (62 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division
Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division (62 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Penn Line Service, Inc. - Line Division has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · PA · Scottdale

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 16 employers in Scottdale, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 15-100 IN 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanwha Q Cells USA Corp. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 105185 - IPP Repowering- 840MW 2x2x1 CC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE BBGY/Bogerconcrete LLC 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glass Fabricator 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bakkavor USA 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Ambulance Authority 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penn Line Tree Service, Inc. 1,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penn Line Corporation - Tree Division 1,390 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penn Line Service, Inc. 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penn Line Service, Inc. - Roadside Division 180 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marshall Dekalb Electric Copperative 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Valley Adult Resources 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schnell Contractors, Inc - Louisville Kentucky 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Tipton LLC 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.