Social organizations, civic and fraternal · Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Name: Pennsylvania Horticultural Society Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Philadelphia, PA · ~109 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 4.2
Avg TCR: 2.1
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pennsylvania Horticultural Society runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Social organizations, civic and fraternal workplace, earning a grade F.

Pennsylvania Horticultural Society: 4.2 TCR = 200% of Social organizations, civic and fraternal BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pennsylvania Horticultural Society safety composite

Pennsylvania Horticultural Society scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers
DART rate: D 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2017→2018

Pennsylvania Horticultural Society injury rate improved

Pennsylvania Horticultural Society's TCR fell 4.2 from 6.3 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.3 · 2018=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813410 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.2 · 200% of ind

DART 2.1 DART
RANK #2/6
PHOTO Chester Family YMCA
BOOK 2y book
INJ 8 inj
SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chester Family YMCA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

This site

4.2
Chester Family

4.2
OCY - CBCC Sto

4.2
Martis Camp Co

4.2
Tehachapi

4.2

What this shows Pennsylvania Horticultural Society averages 4.2 TCR (200% of the Social organizations, civic and fraternal BLS benchmark).

Pennsylvania Horticultural Society TCR series: 2017=6.3 · 2018=2.1 · BLS 2.1

Where Pennsylvania Horticultural Society falls in its industry

298 Social organizations, civic an establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Social organizations, civic an employers in Pennsylvania.

Pennsylvania Horticultural Society (109 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Pennsylvania Horticultural Society has more employees than the Social organizations, civic and fraterna median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	2.1	2.1	2	0	0
2017	6.3	0.0	6	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813410 · PA · Philadelphia

298 Social organizations, civic and fraternal employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Chester Family YMCA	CHESTER, VA	4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	OCY - CBCC Stoughton	STOUGHTON, MA	4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Martis Camp Community Association	TRUCKEE, CA	4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Tehachapi	TEHACHAPI, CA	4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Pittsburgh Operations	BETHEL PARK	109 FTE
STATE-SIZE	HRV Conformance Verification Associates, Inc.	MOON TWP.	109 FTE
STATE-SIZE	J.C. Lee Construction and Supply Company, Inc	PETROLIA	109 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Neshaminy Electrical Contractors, Inc.	BENSALEM	109 FTE
CITY-NEAR	FIVE BELOW INC	Philadelphia	19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Hospital of University of Pennsylvania	Philadelphia	13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital	Philadelphia	9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR	The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus	Philadelphia	9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR	Global Container Terminal New York	Staten Island, NY	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Main	St. Joseph, MO	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	United Helpers Residence, Inc. dba RiverLedge Residence	Ogdensburg, NY	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Summers County ARH	Hinton, WV	4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Manor Care Health Services - Appleton	Appleton, WI	109 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Town of Chapel Hill - Public Works	Chapel Hill, NC	109 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Arizona Office Technologies - Phoenix	Phoenix, AZ	109 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Harland Clarke Holdings - Florence	Florence, KY	109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.