Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Texas

Green Bay Packaging

Ft Worth, TX · ~120 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Bay Packaging runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Green Bay Packaging: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Bay Packaging safety composite

Green Bay Packaging scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Green Bay Packaging: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 3.2× in 2024

Green Bay Packaging's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 3.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Ft Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #2/102
  • PHOTO International Paper …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: International Paper Statesville Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Green Bay Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Bay Packaging averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Bay Packaging TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Green Bay Packaging falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 102 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Texas.

Green Bay Packaging (120 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Bay Packaging
Green Bay Packaging (120 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Green Bay Packaging has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · TX · Ft Worth

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 63 employers in Ft Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR International Paper Statesville Container 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Packaging Corporation 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Opus Packaging - Florence 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA HEXACOMB 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE San Saba Pecan, LP 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Savanna Drilling LLC 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Livingston Branch 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fritcher Construction Services 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR INDEPENDENCE HUB (TXFOR) 1,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXFOR - INDEPENDENCE HUB 1,540 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Office 925 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZNFW 665 FTE
NAT-TCR Flowserve Cookeville 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pfizer Field Force 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Murfreesboro - D032 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Morristown, TN - Flexible Pkg - E012 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grand Junction (92) 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powell Electronics Inc (Corporate) 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Styline Logistics Indiana 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0301 Boulder 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.