CLINICAL LABORATORY · New Mexico

Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital

Albuquerque, NM · ~85 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical CLINICAL LABORATORY workplace, earning a grade D.

Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital: 5.2 TCR = 137% of CLINICAL LABORATORY BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital safety composite

Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2022

Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital injury rate improved

Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital's TCR fell 0.9 from 4.7 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=6.0 · 2022=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621511 · Albuquerque, NM ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 137% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #7/13
  • PHOTO Adventist HealthCare…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Adventist HealthCare Capital Choice Pathology Laboratory (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital averages 5.2 TCR (137% of the CLINICAL LABORATORY BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=6 · 2021=6 · 2022=3.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital falls in its industry

162 CLINICAL LABORATORY establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 13 CLINICAL LABORATORY employers in New Mexico.

Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital (85 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital
Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital (85 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital has fewer employees than the CLINICAL LABORATORY median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.9 1.0 4 0 0
2021 6.0 1.5 4 0 0
2020 6.0 1.5 3 1 0
2019 3.3 0.0 2 0 0
2018 8.7 2.5 7 0 0
2017 3.9 1.0 4 0 0
2016 4.7 0.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621511 · NM · Albuquerque

162 CLINICAL LABORATORY employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 944 employers in Albuquerque, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Adventist HealthCare Capital Choice Pathology Laboratory 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Symphony Diagnostic Horsham 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Symphony Diagnostic Hapeville 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR UH-TRL-UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABQ Remarketing - 34RK 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Buick GMC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penasco Valley Telephone Cooperative Inc 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR NM-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presbyterian Hospital 4,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Administrative Center 3,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ABQ1 1,917 FTE
NAT-TCR Concorde/Interspace Battery Corp. 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S & F Custom Sign Corp. 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4598-Rtc Nashville 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gastonia Components and Logistics - Tulip 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE HawSaw, Inc 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Saybrook at Haddam 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Grocers # 125 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Grocers #119 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.