Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Connecticut

The Saybrook at Haddam

Haddam, CT · ~85 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Saybrook at Haddam runs at 261% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Saybrook at Haddam: 9.9 TCR = 261% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Saybrook at Haddam safety composite

The Saybrook at Haddam scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Saybrook at Haddam: 9.3 → 10.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 18.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.73× in 2022

The Saybrook at Haddam's TCR rose 1.6 from 9.3 in 2016 to 10.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Haddam, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 261% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #38/100
  • PHOTO Bonaventure of Castl…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bonaventure of Castle Rock LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

The Saybrook at Haddam in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Saybrook at Haddam averages 9.9 TCR (261% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Saybrook at Haddam TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=17.2 · 2021=18.3 · 2022=10.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Saybrook at Haddam falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Connecticut.

The Saybrook at Haddam (85 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Saybrook at Haddam
The Saybrook at Haddam (85 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Saybrook at Haddam has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 10.9 7.3 4 2 0
2021 18.3 18.3 2 9 0
2020 17.2 17.2 1 10 0
2019 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 9.3 4.7 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CT · Haddam

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 4 employers in Haddam, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bonaventure of Castle Rock LLC 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Mount Vernon Drive 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR B-X Mansfield LLC 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Providence Place of Hazleton 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greenskies Clean Energy LLC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITW Graphics 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE 570 - Hartford 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thinklogical, A Belden Brand 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commonwealth Senior Living at Haddam 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Haddam 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Bridge Company - 422110 32 FTE
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-00114 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincoln Industries - Fabrication 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospital HIMA San Pablo Fajardo 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Craneville Place of Dalton 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ph-Trl-Presbyterian Hospital 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE HawSaw, Inc 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Grocers # 125 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Grocers #119 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.