Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · North Carolina

PHC Restoration Inc

Lillington, NC · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PHC Restoration Inc runs at 211% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade F.

PHC Restoration Inc: 6.1 TCR = 211% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PHC Restoration Inc safety composite

PHC Restoration Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

PHC Restoration Inc: 5.3 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 13.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.14× in 2024

PHC Restoration Inc's TCR rose 1.7 from 5.3 in 2017 to 7.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Lillington, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.1 · 211% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #89/93
  • PHOTO Elder Construction, …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elder Construction, Inc - Colorado Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

PHC Restoration Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PHC Restoration Inc averages 6.1 TCR (211% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PHC Restoration Inc TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=13.1 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=7 · BLS 2.9

Where PHC Restoration Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 93 Addition, alteration and renov employers in North Carolina.

PHC Restoration Inc (25 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate PHC Restoration Inc
PHC Restoration Inc (25 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

PHC Restoration Inc has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2023 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2022 7.8 7.8 2 0 0
2021 13.1 8.7 3 0 0
2020 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2017 5.3 5.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NC · Lillington

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 35 employers in Lillington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elder Construction, Inc - Colorado Springs 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR King Construction Company LLC 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DSISD New WSES & DSMS Reno 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construct 1 One, Corp 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fair View Nursery, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE John William Carter III 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hill of Berry's 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrew Tyson Farms 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Harnett-Sheriff Department 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Harnett-Social Services 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR Champion Home Builders 023 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Harnett-Emergency Management 179 FTE
NAT-TCR Omaha 136 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR S5 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Blacksburg 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexander Ranch, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bhj - Fresno 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kocourek Motor Company 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Myers 107 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fargo Luther Collision, LLC 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.