Community action service agencies · North Carolina

County of Harnett-Social Services

Lillington, NC · ~218 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

County of Harnett-Social Services runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Community action service agencies workplace, earning a grade B.

County of Harnett-Social Services: 2.5 TCR = 66% of Community action service agencies BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

County of Harnett-Social Services safety composite

County of Harnett-Social Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

County of Harnett-Social Services injury rate improved

County of Harnett-Social Services's TCR fell 1.6 from 2.7 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Lillington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO TS SpringPart
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~218 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TS SpringPart (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

County of Harnett-Social Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows County of Harnett-Social Services averages 2.5 TCR (66% of the Community action service agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

County of Harnett-Social Services TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.8

Where County of Harnett-Social Services falls in its industry

990 Community action service agenc establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Community action service agenc employers in North Carolina.

County of Harnett-Social Services (218 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate County of Harnett-Social Services
County of Harnett-Social Services (218 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

County of Harnett-Social Services has more employees than the Community action service agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.5 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.9 0.0 8 0 0
2020 3.4 0.0 7 0 0
2019 3.8 0.5 5 2 0
2018 4.7 0.5 9 0 0
2016 2.7 1.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · NC · Lillington

990 Community action service agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 35 employers in Lillington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TS SpringPart 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Human Services Agency 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blueprints 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MPA Rumney Residential 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henkel Corporation Salisbury, NC 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cree LED, InC. 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGSP-W528 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Honeywell Process Solutions - NC45 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Harnett-Sheriff Department 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Champion Home Builders 023 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Harnett-Emergency Management 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boon Edam 173 FTE
NAT-TCR BK Laser LLC 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sumitomo SV5 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Wabash College 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Coastal Landscape and Design, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vermont Precision Tools, Inc 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE SECAUCUS 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE MMR Constructors, Inc. - Mobile Operations 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Sol Contracting/ES II Enterprises JV 218 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.