Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing · Michigan

Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI

Auburn Hills, MI · ~24 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI: 1.7 TCR = 50% of Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI safety composite

Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2019→2024

Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI injury rate improved

Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI's TCR fell 0.4 from 5.2 in 2019 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/12
  • PHOTO IDEX Corp
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IDEX Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI averages 1.7 TCR (50% of the Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI TCR series: 2019=5.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI falls in its industry

322 Instruments for industrial pro establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 12 Instruments for industrial pro employers in Michigan.

Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI (24 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI
Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI (24 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI has fewer employees than the Instruments for industrial process contr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · MI · Auburn Hills

322 Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IDEX Corp 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerson Automation Solutions - Eden Prairie 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoseon Technology, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TMCO Operating 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Medina Dairy, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sturgis 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE CE Innovation Center 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Filtration and Meter Shop 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR International Paper - Oklahoma City 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Whitaker Finishing LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Auria Albemarle 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Regency Cambridge 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Markham Inc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dogwood Energy Facility 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE YKK AP America - Cincinnati, Ohio Facility 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barton Solvents, Inc. KC 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.