Detention centers · Arizona

Pima Reentry Center

TUCSON, AZ · ~49 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Pima Reentry Center runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Detention centers workplace, earning a grade A.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.2
industry benchmark (BLS)
5
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Pima Reentry Center's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 8 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.

Injury rate over time

Pima Reentry Center's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.2 industry benchmark.

Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 922140.

-202468 20172018201920202021202220232024 03.2 Industry benchmarkPima Reentry Center TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 922140.

Where Pima Reentry Center falls in its industry

508 Detention centers establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Pima Reentry Center has an average TCR of 1.3, which is 41% of the industry average (3.2) for Detention centers. This is significantly better than average.

Safety Insights for Pima Reentry Center

Pima Reentry Center operates an establishment with approximately 49 full-time equivalent workers in TUCSON, AZ, classified under the Detention centers industry (NAICS 922140). Across 8 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 5 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the A letter grade (Excellent Safety Record).

Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.2 for Detention centers, Pima Reentry Center's workforce experiences 41% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked, a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers, so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.

Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 8 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Pima Reentry Center as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries, there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Pima Reentry Center's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 922140 - Detention centers.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 102,905 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Pima Reentry Center (this establishment) 1.32 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 8-year avg
Prisons industry avg 3.20 BLS IIF, NAICS 922140
Arizona state avg (all industries) 4.73 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Pima Reentry Center to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.2 6.2 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 2.3 0.0 1 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Pima Reentry Center's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Detention centers peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 41% of the Detention centers benchmark, Pima Reentry Center reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Detention centers sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Pima Reentry Center's safety grade?
Pima Reentry Center has a safety grade of A (Excellent Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.3 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.2 for Detention centers.
How is the safety grade calculated?
Safety grades are calculated by comparing an employer's average Total Case Rate (TCR) - the number of workplace injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers per year, against the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) industry benchmark. Grade A means significantly below average injury rates; grade F means significantly above average.
How many injuries has Pima Reentry Center reported?
Pima Reentry Center has reported 5 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 8 years of OSHA data (2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
All safety data comes from OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA), which collects mandatory establishment-level injury and illness reports from employers with 250+ employees or those in high-hazard industries. Industry benchmarks are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program.

Explore More Safety Data

→ More employers in Arizona → Industry: Detention centers → Safety grades explained → How to check employer safety → Understanding OSHA rates
Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

All employers → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial