Hospitality · Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland

Pittsburgh, PA · ~229 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hospitality workplace, earning a grade C.

Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland: 3.2 TCR = 107% of Hospitality BLS 3.0 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland safety composite

Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2021

Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland injury rate improved

Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.2 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 107% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #102/289
  • PHOTO Hampton Ellenton
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~229 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hampton Ellenton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland averages 3.2 TCR (107% of the Hospitality BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=3.1 · BLS 3.0

Where Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland falls in its industry

9,342 Hospitality establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 289 Hospitality employers in Pennsylvania.

Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland (229 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland
Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland (229 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland has more employees than the Hospitality median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.1 0.0 7 0 0
2020 3.1 0.0 7 0 0
2019 3.1 0.0 7 0 0
2018 3.1 0.0 7 0 0
2017 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2016 4.2 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · PA · Pittsburgh

9,342 Hospitality employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hampton Ellenton 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DoubleTree by Hilton Jacksonville Airport 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn Express 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 170-DALLAS FORT WORTH AIRPORT MARRIOTT 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warminster Service Building 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dillsburg 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dean Dairy - Sharpsville 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE E00610-Pepperidge Farm Downingtown 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Bridgewater Interiors III 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Triumph Aerostructures, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashley Sling Atlanta 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MPM - New Smynra Beach 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE FuelCell Energy - Danbury 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Non Manufacturing 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer Distribution - Pleasant Praire - Unit 872 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jordano's Food Service 229 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.