Administration of Urban Planning and Community and Rural Development · Arizona
Planning and Development Services
Tucson, AZ · ~73 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.3
- Avg TCR
- 3.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Planning and Development Services runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Administration of Urban Planning and Community and Rural Development workplace, earning a grade A.
Planning and Development Services: 1.3 TCR = 42% of Administration of Urban Planning and Community and Rural Development BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Planning and Development Services safety composite
Planning and Development Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
65/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- C 1.33 per 100 workers
Safer than 62% of industry peers
- DART rate
- B 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 77% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 52% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−3.2
2016→2022
Planning and Development Services injury rate improved
Planning and Development Services's TCR fell 3.2 from 3.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=3.2 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 925120 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL
Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 42% of ind
- DART 0.0 DART
- RANK #2/4
- PHOTO Planning & Developme…
- BOOK 7y book
- INJ 5 inj
- SIZE ~73 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Planning & Development Services (0.1 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →
Planning and Development Services in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- Planning & Dev
Planning & Development Services
1.5 TCR
- This site
Planning and Development Services
1.3 TCR
- Metropolitan C
Metropolitan Council Regional Administration
1.2 TCR
- Community Serv
Community Services Board
1.2 TCR
- San Joaquin Co
San Joaquin County Community Development
1 TCR
What this shows Planning and Development Services averages 1.3 TCR (42% of the Administration of Urban Planning and Community and Rural Development BLS benchmark).
Planning and Development Services TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.2
Where Planning and Development Services falls in its industry
50 Administration of Urban Planni establishmentsSafer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.
Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Administration of Urban Planni employers in Arizona.
Planning and Development Services has more employees than the Administration of Urban Planning and Com median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
925120 · AZ · Tucson
50 Administration of Urban Planning and Community and Rural Development employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Planning & Development Services | 1.5 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Metropolitan Council Regional Administration | 1.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Community Services Board | 1.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | San Joaquin County Community Development | 1.0 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Soothing Options | 73 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Santa Cruz | 73 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | K. Hovnanian Homes Phoenix Group Office/AZ Division | 73 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Fulton Homes Sales Corp | 73 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | University of Arizona | 18,951 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site | 9,878 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Tucson Medical Center | 4,407 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson | 3,989 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Your Building Centers Inc. State College, PA | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | PEARL, MS (Jackson) | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Border States Electric - Ladson | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Main | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | New Columbia | 73 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | US Wire : Houston | 73 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | 3127 Dan'S East Bismarck | 73 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Bh Eastern One Wilmington Bhs | 73 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.