Polishing metals and metal products for the trade · Ohio
Plant 2
Piqua, OH · ~15 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 0.0
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Plant 2 runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Polishing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 0.0
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 19
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Plant 2's OSHA Total Case Rate of 0.0 to the Polishing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark of 3.3 (0% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Plant 2's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Plant 2 falls in its industry
643 Polishing metals and metal pro establishmentsSafer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.
Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 68 Polishing metals and metal pro employers in Ohio.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 19 injuries shown on this page for Plant 2 are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 332813 - Polishing metals and metal products for the trade.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2020)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 11,020 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Plant 2 (this establishment) | 0.00 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 332813 |
| Ohio state avg (all industries) | 3.90 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Plant 2 to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2020: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 19 reportable incidents · 19 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 96.5 | 35.6 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Plant 2's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Polishing metals and metal products for the trade peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 0% of the Polishing metals and metal products for the trade benchmark, Plant 2 reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Polishing metals and metal products for the trade sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Plant 2's safety grade?
How many injuries has Plant 2 reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Ohio, and by nearby establishments in Piqua - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~0.0)
Similar size (~15 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.