Carpet and Rug Mills · Georgia

Plant W9

Eton, GA · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Plant W9 runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Carpet and Rug Mills workplace, earning a grade C.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
0
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Plant W9's OSHA Total Case Rate of 0.0 to the Carpet and Rug Mills BLS benchmark of 3.3 (0% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Plant W9's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

-101234 20182019 03.3 Industry benchmarkPlant W9 TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 314110.

Where Plant W9 falls in its industry

180 Carpet and Rug Mills establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 127 Carpet and Rug Mills employers in Georgia.

Trend analysis for Plant W9

Between 2018 and 2019, Plant W9's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 0.0 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 0% change across 1 year of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2018 saw the highest rate, at 0.0, a spread of 0.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, Plant W9 recorded 0 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 0 injuries shown on this page for Plant W9 are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 314110 - Carpet and Rug Mills.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2019)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 79,417 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Plant W9 (this establishment) 0.00 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Carpets and rugs made from textile materials industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 314110
Georgia state avg (all industries) 4.11 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Plant W9 to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Plant W9's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Carpet and Rug Mills peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 0% of the Carpet and Rug Mills benchmark, Plant W9 reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Carpet and Rug Mills sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Plant W9's safety grade?
Plant W9 has a safety grade of C (Average Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 0.0 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Carpet and Rug Mills.
How many injuries has Plant W9 reported?
Plant W9 has reported 0 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2019, 2018). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Georgia, and by nearby establishments in Eton - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.