Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Wisconsin

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc.

Cross Plains, WI · ~327 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc.: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. safety composite

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. injury rate improved

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 3.1 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Cross Plains, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #63/166
  • PHOTO Soft-Lite LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 77 inj
  • SIZE ~327 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Soft-Lite LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 166 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Wisconsin.

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. (327 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Plastic Ingenuity, Inc.
Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. (327 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. has more employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.1 5 0 0
2023 2.7 1.9 10 0 0
2022 3.5 2.6 12 0 0
2021 2.6 2.3 9 0 0
2020 1.5 0.6 5 0 0
2019 3.5 1.7 10 0 0
2018 2.7 0.7 8 0 0
2017 4.2 2.3 11 0 0
2016 3.1 0.8 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · WI · Cross Plains

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 3 employers in Cross Plains, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Soft-Lite LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pella 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kamco Industries, Inc Jackson St. Plant 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pennsboro Plant 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE North American Mechanical Inc. 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1901, Inc. 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Valley Foods, LLC 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kwik Trip Sweet Goods Bakery 779 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milestone Senior Living-Cross Plains 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milestone Senior Living Cross Plains 25 FTE
NAT-TCR Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tindall Corporation - Georgia Division 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 207 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Asf 406 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Guardian Industries -Carleton 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Chemours Company FC, LLC - Chambers Works 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE ELZ 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Headquarters 327 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.