Sawmills · Pennsylvania

Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division

Mill Hall, PA · ~23 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sawmills workplace, earning a grade C.

Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Sawmills BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division safety composite

Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2024

Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division injury rate improved

Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division's TCR fell 4.4 from 4.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321113 · Mill Hall, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/47
  • PHOTO Bluegrass Fence Manu…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bluegrass Fence Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Sawmills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division falls in its industry

905 Sawmills establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 47 Sawmills employers in Pennsylvania.

Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division (23 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division
Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division (23 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Bingaman & Son Lumber, Pine Creek Lumber Division has fewer employees than the Sawmills median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 13.7 9.1 3 0 0
2018 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321113 · PA · Mill Hall

905 Sawmills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 17 employers in Mill Hall, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bluegrass Fence Manufacturing 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hoffman Brothers Lumer Inc 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Longview Lumber 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinzua/Pilot Rock - WP 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt. Parnell Fisheries Co. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Run Energy, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPV Fairview LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Corporate Office 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2528 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2528 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mill Hall 120 Airstrip Dr, Mill Hall, PA 17751 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR Croda Mill Hall 161 FTE
NAT-TCR Tindall Corporation - Georgia Division 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Asf 406 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Traverse City 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 01 Metro West 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sylacauga Alabama Plant 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monical's Pizza Rantoul 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monical's Pizza Knoxville 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.