Game and inland fish agencies · Arizona

Phoenix Headquarters

Phoenix, AZ · ~327 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phoenix Headquarters runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Game and inland fish agencies workplace, earning a grade D.

Phoenix Headquarters: 4.6 TCR = 145% of Game and inland fish agencies BLS 3.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phoenix Headquarters safety composite

Phoenix Headquarters scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Phoenix Headquarters injury rate improved

Phoenix Headquarters's TCR fell 0.4 from 5.8 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 145% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #10/20
  • PHOTO Charleston County Pa…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 108 inj
  • SIZE ~327 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Charleston County Park and Recreation Commission (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Phoenix Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phoenix Headquarters averages 4.6 TCR (145% of the Game and inland fish agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phoenix Headquarters TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=3 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Phoenix Headquarters falls in its industry

413 Game and inland fish agencies establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 20 Game and inland fish agencies employers in Arizona.

Phoenix Headquarters (327 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Phoenix Headquarters
Phoenix Headquarters (327 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Phoenix Headquarters has more employees than the Game and inland fish agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 2.9 15 0 0
2023 4.8 1.8 12 1 0
2022 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2021 3.5 2.8 9 1 0
2020 3.0 1.0 8 1 0
2019 8.7 5.1 23 1 0
2018 4.7 1.7 13 1 0
2017 5.3 4.1 12 2 0
2016 5.8 2.2 14 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · AZ · Phoenix

413 Game and inland fish agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Charleston County Park and Recreation Commission 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshall Leupke Community Center 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Concord Parks & Recreation 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Kittery Recreation Department 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Springerville Generating Station 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1474 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2671 327 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yuma County Sheriff's Office 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR SECO Energy - Groveland 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Milsco- Jackson 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Schutt Industries 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kwik Trip Sweet Goods Bakery 779 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Chemours Company FC, LLC - Chambers Works 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plastic Ingenuity, Inc. 327 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guardian Industries -Carleton 327 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.