Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers · Oregon
Plastic Machining
PORTLAND, OR · ~35 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 6.7
- Avg TCR
- 2.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Plastic Machining runs at 303% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 6.7
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.2
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 5
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Plastic Machining's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Plastic Machining's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.2 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 424610.
Where Plastic Machining falls in its industry
130 Foam, plastics, resins and sha establishmentsSafer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.
Plastic Machining has an average TCR of 6.7, which is 303% of the industry average (2.2) for Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers. This is significantly worse than average.
Safety Insights for Plastic Machining
Plastic Machining operates an establishment with approximately 35 full-time equivalent workers in PORTLAND, OR, classified under the Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers industry (NAICS 424610). Across 2 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 5 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the F letter grade (Failing Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 2.2 for Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers, Plastic Machining's workforce experiences 303% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked, a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers, so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR above the benchmark flags a higher-than-typical risk profile for jobseekers, insurers, and enforcement agencies to examine.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 2 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Plastic Machining as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries, there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Plastic Machining's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 424610 - Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 75,007 hours worked = 8.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Plastic Machining (this establishment) | 6.67 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Plastics materials merchant wholesalers industry avg | 2.20 | BLS IIF, NAICS 424610 |
| Oregon state avg (all industries) | 6.16 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Plastic Machining to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 13.3 | 8.0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Plastic Machining's reported OSHA injury record versus its Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 303% of the Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers benchmark, Plastic Machining reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Plastic Machining's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Plastic Machining reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.