Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local · Tennessee

Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal

Charleston, TN · ~26 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local workplace, earning a grade A.

Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal: 1.2 TCR = 27% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal safety composite

Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2023→2024

Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal injury rate improved

Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Charleston, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/23
  • PHOTO Aramiz Logistics LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aramiz Logistics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal averages 1.2 TCR (27% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal TCR series: 2023=2.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal falls in its industry

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 23 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in Tennessee.

Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal (26 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal
Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal (26 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Plug Power Charleston TN Terminal has fewer employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · TN · Charleston

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 17 employers in Charleston, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aramiz Logistics LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Muskegon 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peco Farms Live Haul 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8100 Blue Parkway Dr. 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod - Nashville 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tobacco Pride 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tennessee Farms 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE CEMC-Springfield 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CHA2 1,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CHA2 847 FTE
CITY-NEAR WACKER Polysilicon North America 714 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. 406 FTE
NAT-TCR Taste Maker Foods 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Caulking, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Coaches, Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 741 Knoxville Crossing 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE S & S Packaging Products, Inc 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith Propane 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edward Segal Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springhill Suites Cheyenne 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.