Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · Minnesota

Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS)

Plymouth, MN · ~303 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS) runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade A.

Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS): 0.1 TCR = 2% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS) safety composite

Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS) held a steady TCR band

Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS)'s TCR held near 0.3 from 0.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Plymouth, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO Fishers FS HQ (SSS, …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~303 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fishers FS HQ (SSS, CSS) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS) averages 0.1 TCR (2% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS) TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS) falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Security alarm systems sales c employers in Minnesota.

Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS) (303 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS)
Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS) (303 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Plymouth MC FS (SSS, CSS) has more employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.3 0.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · MN · Plymouth

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 321 employers in Plymouth, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fishers FS HQ (SSS, CSS) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kalispell MT 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR VA-90-FALLS CHURCH, VA 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acadian Total Security 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 2643 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Staff 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE Memorial Blood Centers 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakeshore 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Service LLC 3,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP SH Plymouth MN 2,084 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP / SH Plymouth MN 1,982 FTE
CITY-NEAR CN Plymouth 1,565 FTE
NAT-TCR Phillips 66 Lake Charles Manufacturing Complex 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Elmhurst Specialty Sales Office 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 104000 - Calcasieu Pass 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Acuity Brands Lighting 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coastal Plywood Company 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arbor - Urbana Sd 116 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE CRRST - Central Garden Retail Merchandising 303 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.