Motor vehicle parts and accessories, new, merchant wholesalers · Florida
Port Processing
JACKSONVILLE, FL · ~184 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 7.7
- Avg TCR
- 2.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Port Processing runs at 350% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Motor vehicle parts and accessories, new, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 7.7
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.2
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 120
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Port Processing's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 9 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Port Processing's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.2 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 423100.
Port Processing has an average TCR of 7.7, which is 350% of the industry average (2.2) for Motor vehicle parts and accessories, new, merchant wholesalers. This is significantly worse than average.
Safety Insights for Port Processing
Port Processing operates an establishment with approximately 184 full-time equivalent workers in JACKSONVILLE, FL, classified under the Motor vehicle parts and accessories, new, merchant wholesalers industry (NAICS 423100). Across 9 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 120 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 7.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the F letter grade (Failing Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 2.2 for Motor vehicle parts and accessories, new, merchant wholesalers, Port Processing's workforce experiences 350% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked, a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers, so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR above the benchmark flags a higher-than-typical risk profile for jobseekers, insurers, and enforcement agencies to examine.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 9 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Port Processing as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries, there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Port Processing's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 423100 - Motor vehicle parts and accessories, new, merchant wholesalers.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 336,526 hours worked = 1.78 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Port Processing (this establishment) | 7.71 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 9-year avg |
| Motor vehicle parts and accessories, new, merchant wholesalers industry avg | 2.20 | BLS IIF, NAICS 423100 |
| Florida state avg (all industries) | 4.57 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Port Processing to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 10 reportable incidents · 10 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2021: 8 reportable incidents · 8 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 13 reportable incidents · 13 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 27 reportable incidents · 27 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 19 reportable incidents · 19 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 19 reportable incidents · 19 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 15 reportable incidents · 15 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 5.2 | 4.7 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8.4 | 1.3 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 17.0 | 1.9 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 10.1 | 7.4 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 10.4 | 6.0 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 8.3 | 5.0 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Port Processing's reported OSHA injury record versus its Motor vehicle parts and accessories, new, merchant wholesalers peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 350% of the Motor vehicle parts and accessories, new, merchant wholesalers benchmark, Port Processing reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Motor vehicle parts and accessories, new, merchant wholesalers sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Port Processing's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Port Processing reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.