Harbor operation · New Jersey

Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey

Jersey City, NJ · ~126 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Harbor operation workplace, earning a grade B.

Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey: 3.0 TCR = 66% of Harbor operation BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey safety composite

Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2024

Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey injury rate improved

Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey's TCR fell 5.8 from 6.7 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2018=3.2 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488310 · Jersey City, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK P67
  • PHOTO C-60 Berth 60
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C-60 Berth 60 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey averages 3.0 TCR (66% of the Harbor operation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2018=3.2 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey falls in its industry

81 Harbor operation establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey (126 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey
Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey (126 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Port Securing and Maintenance of New Jersey has more employees than the Harbor operation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 3 0 0
2023 5.9 3.9 9 0 0
2022 2.8 1.9 8 1 0
2021 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2020 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2018 3.2 2.8 7 1 0
2016 6.7 4.5 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488310 · NJ · Jersey City

81 Harbor operation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 167 employers in Jersey City, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C-60 Berth 60 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coas5t Maritime Services 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Naval Diving & Salvage Training Center (NDSTC) 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Container Terminal Berths 247-270 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Component Assembly Systems New Jersey 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cranford 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE RRSC Middlesex 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arctic Air Conditioning 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kuehne + Nagel Inc CL 3,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jersey City Medical Center 2,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kuehne + Nagel Inc SAL 2,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR 333869-NEW JERSEY NDC 2,118 FTE
NAT-TCR Louis Dreyfus Company - Grand Junction 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CIT Trucks - Bensenville 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylor Farms Illinois 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Strip, Inc. Middletown 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Republic Plastics, Ltd. (AZ) 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversicare of Foley 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3063 Keystone 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE MEPPI530 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.