Scheduled air passenger carriers · Oregon

Portland Station Horizon

Portland, OR · ~652 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Portland Station Horizon runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Scheduled air passenger carriers workplace, earning a grade D.

Portland Station Horizon: 7.3 TCR = 162% of Scheduled air passenger carriers BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Portland Station Horizon safety composite

Portland Station Horizon scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2024

Portland Station Horizon injury rate improved

Portland Station Horizon's TCR fell 4.1 from 9.4 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.4 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 162% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #11/25
  • PHOTO 1004-12 GoJet STL In…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 329 inj
  • SIZE ~652 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1004-12 GoJet STL Inflight (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Portland Station Horizon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Portland Station Horizon averages 7.3 TCR (162% of the Scheduled air passenger carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Portland Station Horizon TCR series: 2016=9.4 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=5 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Portland Station Horizon falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled air passenger carrie establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 25 Scheduled air passenger carrie employers in Oregon.

Portland Station Horizon (652 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Portland Station Horizon
Portland Station Horizon (652 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Portland Station Horizon has more employees than the Scheduled air passenger carriers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 5.4 16 0 0
2023 4.7 4.7 13 0 0
2022 4.8 4.8 22 0 0
2021 5.1 4.7 16 0 0
2020 5.0 4.8 28 0 0
2019 9.9 8.9 59 0 0
2018 12.9 11.3 79 0 0
2017 8.6 8.0 47 0 0
2016 9.4 7.5 49 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · OR · Portland

1,568 Scheduled air passenger carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1004-12 GoJet STL Inflight 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCO - Maintenance 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LGA LaGuardia Airport 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SW-20730233-IF DTW - DETROIT, MI - SW 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE OR345 PROVIDENCE MILWAUKIE HOSPITAL-MILWAUKIE 652 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mobile Technologies Inc. 655 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6994-SI 649 FTE
STATE-SIZE 500 648 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Eversource - Cheshire 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Zeke's Pueblo Mexicano 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR EH 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE StandardAero-Components Services 652 FTE
NAT-SIZE Analogic 8 Centennial Dr Peabody MA 652 FTE
NAT-SIZE GEM Industrial Inc. - Walbridge Office 652 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Beverage Group Inc. (MS) 652 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.