Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta

Atlanta, GA · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta: 0.6 TCR = 27% of Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta safety composite

Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta: 0.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta's TCR rose 1.8 from 0.0 in 2022 to 1.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/49
  • PHOTO Sims Metal Managemen…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sims Metal Management - Redwood City, CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta averages 0.6 TCR (27% of the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 2.2

Where Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta falls in its industry

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 49 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl employers in Georgia.

Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta (33 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta
Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta (33 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Pratt Recycling, Inc. - Atlanta has fewer employees than the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · GA · Atlanta

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sims Metal Management - Redwood City, CA 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sims Limited Paulina 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbus (SSE) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMM Group SMR Palm Beach 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cairo 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pullet/Breeder Facility 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Gin & Peanut Co., Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE GRP Madison 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR AC Hotel Louisville Downtown 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR La Grange Crane Service, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR BTB Poland Spring Factory 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HellermannTyton FK 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cross General Contracting, Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Equix Energy Services, LLC - Corpus Christi 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alnye Trucking LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Harbor at Opelika 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.