Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Ohio

Rhinestahl CTS

Mason, OH · ~91 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rhinestahl CTS runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Rhinestahl CTS: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rhinestahl CTS safety composite

Rhinestahl CTS scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rhinestahl CTS: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.52× in 2024

Rhinestahl CTS's TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Mason, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #5/46
  • PHOTO Walbar Peabody LLC (…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Walbar Peabody LLC (Peabody MA) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Rhinestahl CTS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rhinestahl CTS averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rhinestahl CTS TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Rhinestahl CTS falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 46 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Ohio.

Rhinestahl CTS (91 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Rhinestahl CTS
Rhinestahl CTS (91 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Rhinestahl CTS has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.6 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · OH · Mason

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 159 employers in Mason, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Walbar Peabody LLC (Peabody MA) 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt & Whitney East Hartford 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Qualiseal Technology 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls Royce: Excellence 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gahanna 825 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Columbus 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.E. Middleton Construction Main office 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intelligrated Systems, LLC, dba Honeywell Intelligrated and its successors 1,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intelligrated Systems LLC - Installations 966 FTE
CITY-NEAR HQ & FIELD 915 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics 892 FTE
NAT-TCR Lehman Roofing, Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilbane Building Company Baltimore 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR S02936 - Tontitown Landfill 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lumber City Corp. Corporate Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charles E. Thomas Company 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Communication Electronic Systems LLC 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Demmer Investments IV, Inc. dba Quality Tool (SD) 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yuba County Water Agency 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.