Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing · Massachusetts

Pratt & Whitney Engine Services

Norwood, MA · ~18 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt & Whitney Engine Services runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Pratt & Whitney Engine Services: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt & Whitney Engine Services safety composite

Pratt & Whitney Engine Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pratt & Whitney Engine Services held a steady TCR band

Pratt & Whitney Engine Services's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Norwood, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/26
  • PHOTO Deer Valley - HSEMS
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~18 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Deer Valley - HSEMS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Pratt & Whitney Engine Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt & Whitney Engine Services averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt & Whitney Engine Services TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt & Whitney Engine Services falls in its industry

388 Acceleration indicators and sy establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 26 Acceleration indicators and sy employers in Massachusetts.

Pratt & Whitney Engine Services (18 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt & Whitney Engine Services
Pratt & Whitney Engine Services (18 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Pratt & Whitney Engine Services has fewer employees than the Acceleration indicators and systems comp median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · MA · Norwood

388 Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 79 employers in Norwood, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Deer Valley - HSEMS 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NJ Mount Laurel Tech Campus (1450) 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Armtec Defense Technologies North Carolina 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UTC Aerospace Systems 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bluepoint Wind 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE Channel Building Company Inc 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5021 - Halifax MA - Leasing 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE C. White Marine, Inc. 18 FTE
CITY-NEAR HallKeen Assisted Living 717 FTE
CITY-NEAR MANOR - NORWOOD 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR NORWOOD (MANOR) 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Market Foods 428 FTE
NAT-TCR FXI, Inc. - Corporate Office 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Springhill Suites Houston Intercontinental AP 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR RenCen - Tower 500 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 00525 North Temple Office 0.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.