Natural gas pipeline construction · Ohio

Precision Pipeline Services

Lancaster, OH · ~100 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Precision Pipeline Services runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Natural gas pipeline construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Precision Pipeline Services: 0.7 TCR = 26% of Natural gas pipeline construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Precision Pipeline Services safety composite

Precision Pipeline Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Precision Pipeline Services: 0.0 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2024

Precision Pipeline Services's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Lancaster, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #10/32
  • PHOTO Bolt Construction, I…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bolt Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Precision Pipeline Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Precision Pipeline Services averages 0.7 TCR (26% of the Natural gas pipeline construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Precision Pipeline Services TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.9 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Precision Pipeline Services falls in its industry

809 Natural gas pipeline construct establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 32 Natural gas pipeline construct employers in Ohio.

Precision Pipeline Services (100 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Precision Pipeline Services
Precision Pipeline Services (100 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Precision Pipeline Services has fewer employees than the Natural gas pipeline construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2022 0.9 0.0 1 0 1
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.3 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · OH · Lancaster

809 Natural gas pipeline construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 96 employers in Lancaster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bolt Construction, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Redmond_IFS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR M. O'Herron Company 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worley Field Services at Sabic Burkville 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE NORTHEASTERN - NORTHEAST SHOP 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE All Locations 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miles-McClellan Construction Company, Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE JIS at Kraton Polymers Belpre 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfield Medical Center 2,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking Plant 1 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking 688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treehouse Foods, Lancaster OH 329 FTE
NAT-TCR Related Management Company LP 15 Hudson Yards 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Progressive Specialty Glass Company, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites Pittsburgh Settlers Ridge 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR H-2 Enterprises, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Related Partners Inc. 30 Hudson Yards 72 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Llamas Plastics, Inc. 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Center 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.