Control valves, industrial-type, manufacturing · New York

Precision Valve & Automation INC

Cohoes, NY · ~200 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Precision Valve & Automation INC runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Control valves, industrial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Precision Valve & Automation INC: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Control valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Precision Valve & Automation INC safety composite

Precision Valve & Automation INC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2018→2020

Precision Valve & Automation INC injury rate improved

Precision Valve & Automation INC's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.3 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Cohoes, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/12
  • PHOTO CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Precision Valve & Automation INC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Precision Valve & Automation INC averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Control valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Precision Valve & Automation INC TCR series: 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Precision Valve & Automation INC falls in its industry

298 Control valves, industrial-typ establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 Control valves, industrial-typ employers in New York.

Precision Valve & Automation INC (200 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Precision Valve & Automation INC
Precision Valve & Automation INC (200 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Precision Valve & Automation INC has more employees than the Control valves, industrial-type, manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · NY · Cohoes

298 Control valves, industrial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 34 employers in Cohoes, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leslie Controls 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crane Bolingbrook 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR KFV - TANNER 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Patriot Electric Corp 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEPTUNE MECHANICAL INC. 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brockport Facility 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chembio Diagnostic, inc 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eddy Village Green 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Health Partners/ Capital Regional Geriatric Center 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR FPI Mechanical, Inc. 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Capital Regional Geriatric Center 250 FTE
NAT-TCR Wolf Robotics, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Catholic Community Services-Tucson 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Manassas VA Yard 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Electric Pump Des Moines 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harrisburg Distribution Center - ABARTA Coca Cola Beverages 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE 103227 - Alamitos Energy Project 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Breakthru Beverage Delaware 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Timber Ridge Health Care 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.