Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing · New York

CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc.

Hauppauge, NY · ~106 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. safety composite

CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. held a steady TCR band

CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Hauppauge, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Precision Valve & Au…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precision Valve & Automation INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1 · 2018=1 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. falls in its industry

298 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., employers in New York.

CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. (106 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc.
CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. (106 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. has more employees than the Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, ga median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · NY · Hauppauge

298 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 154 employers in Hauppauge, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precision Valve & Automation INC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leslie Controls 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crane Bolingbrook 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR KFV - TANNER 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wayne County Eggs LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consigli Construction NY, LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Bridge Company - 482310 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE J Track 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Care Alliance of NY HQ Hauppauge 990 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teachers Federal Credit Union 786 FTE
CITY-NEAR RECONN 9009 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR CONTRACT PHARMACAL CORP 691 FTE
NAT-TCR DSM Coating Resins, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelby Materials - Beech Grove 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Coty US LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1808 Glenview, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Corporate 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE L'Occitane North American Distribution Center 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Little York 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Jersey Wrecking & Recycling, Inc. 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.